Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos10,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorian Belanger results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 8,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,348 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,028 of 6,218 authors). This Lorian Belanger is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Lorian Belanger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
4%Lorian Belanger (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,348
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate