Author summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos7,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Frankel results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,227 hits. Analysis detected 10,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (5,623 of 6,359 authors). This Julia Frankel is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Julia Frankel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠12%Julia Frankel (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,828
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510011.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos