175 profiles available Framing Effect 26.9% sitewide · through Apr 20, 2026
Signal constellation Compare the typical reporting profile with the word-weighted sitewide rate. Larger halos mean more profile-to-profile variation.
Focus signalActor-Observer Bias Ad Hominem Ambiguity (Equivocation) Anchoring Bias Anecdotal Appeal to Authority Appeal to Emotion Appeal to Nature Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Availability Heuristic Bandwagon Begging the Question Biased Writer Voice Blind-Spot Bias Burden of Proof Composition/Division Confirmation Bias False Dilemma Framing Effect Fundamental Attribution Error Genetic Fallacy Halo Effect Hasty Generalization Hindsight Bias Horn Effect In-Group Bias Loss Aversion Negativity Bias Optimism Bias Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Overconfidence Bias Personal Incredulity Pessimism Bias Politically Left Leaning Bias Politically Right Leaning Bias Post Hoc (False Cause) Primacy Effect Recency Bias Red Herring Representativeness Heuristic Self-Serving Bias Slippery Slope Special Pleading Status Quo Bias Straw Man Sunk Cost Effect Tu Quoque Unattributed Quote Profile median compared with sitewide signal rate Each signal is a point. Horizontal position is profile median, vertical position is sitewide rate, and point size represents the central eighty percent range. 0% 0% 8% 8% 15% 15% 22% 22% 30% 30% Profile median Sitewide rate Framing Effect
Profile range dial Framing Effect across profile types.
Profile ranges for Framing Effect Lines show tenth to ninetieth percentile profile rates. Circles show medians and a diamond shows the sitewide rate. 0% 8% 15% 22% 30% Publications 10.6% Authors 8.8% Speakers 4.0% All profiles 8.5%
Detection orbit Mix of weighted detections.
Detected signal composition A ring divides weighted detections into cognitive biases, logical fallacies, and other signals. 100% detections 63% 32% 5%
Profile carriers Where Framing Effect is most concentrated among the most-analyzed profiles.
Top profile rates for Framing Effect Three lanes compare publication, author, and speaker rates. Larger dots indicate more analyzed words. 0% 15% 31% 46% 62% Publications Authors Speakers Focus profileMove across the chart MS NOW Live Events Louisville Public Media Asian Boss PBS News Hour Classroom FOX Weather MPR News Colorado Public Radio NTD NBC News Associated Press The Washington Post ABC News The Japan Times Fox Business Breaking Points CBS News The Associated Press Brooke Mallory Madeleine Aggeler Izzy Ramirez Noah Hurowitz Associated Press Megan Mineiro The Intercept Briefing Eric Revell Newsmax Wires Anton Troianovski Elian Peltier Erwin Recinos Liliana Segura Matt Sledge Ali Watkins Jeff Clark Betsey Stevenson Ali Gharib Matt Duss Cara Spencer Akela Lacy Narges Bajoghli Trey Yinx Pete Hegseth J.D. Vance Zohran Mamdani Jack Keane Péter Magyar Fatih Birol JD Vance Quinton Lucas Move across a dot to identify a profile; dot size reflects analyzed words.
Reading the view: sitewide rates are word-weighted; every profile has equal weight in medians and central-80% ranges. The constellation’s halo encodes the 10th-to-90th-percentile spread, not certainty or sample size. Distribution ranges use a stable sample of up to 0 profiles per type.