22.1K articles rankedframing effect76.7% higher vs 1.2% lower

Signal gap atlas

Distance shows how strongly the high and low ends of the ranking separate.

High and low ranking signal comparisonHorizontal connected dots compare higher-score, lower-score, and overall rates for each reasoning signal.0%25%50%75%100%framing effect1%77%negativity biasappeal to emotionappeal to authorityambiguity (equivocation)biased writer voicein-group biashalo effectrecency biasout-group homogeneity biasfundamental attribution errorunattributed quote
Higher-score averageLower-score averageOverall average

Rank terrain

Position connects percentile, BS score, and the amount of supporting analysis.

BS score by ranking percentileDots show ranking examples. Horizontal position is percentile, vertical position is BS score, and dot size reflects supporting analyzed items.0255075100th0%50%100%Ranking percentileBS scoreThree vessels hit by Iranian fire in Strait of Hormuz hours after Trump extends cease-fire
Higher-score cohort

Three vessels hit by Iranian fire in Strait of Hormuz hours after Trump extends cease-fire

Open analysis →
Reasoning fingerprint for Three vessels hit by Iranian fire in Strait of Hormuz hours after Trump extends cease-fireA radial comparison of the selected example and the overall average across prominent reasoning signals.framing effectnegativity biasappeal to author…appeal to emotionambiguity (equiv…biased writer vo…in-group biashalo effect
BS score100.0%
Percentile96%
Strongest shownframing effect · 75.9%
Selected exampleOverall average

Reading the view: the atlas compares group averages, the terrain shows only the ranking-edge examples supplied by the snapshot, and the fingerprint compares one selected example with the eligible-profile average.