Author summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos6,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Daly results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 5,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,430 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (4,681 of 6,244 authors). This Matthew Daly is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Matthew Daly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠25%Matthew Daly (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,430
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos