Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 9,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Leicester results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Pessimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 3,246 hits . Analysis detected 22,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,511 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,075 of 6,162 authors). This John Leicester is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. John Leicester
Author details
Total words: 22,511
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst