Author summary
52% 12 analyzed articles/videos 12,586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darlene Superville results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 3,395 hits . Analysis detected 27,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,785 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (6,118 of 6,628 authors). This Darlene Superville is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Darlene Superville
Author details
Total words: 39,785
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score12 analyzed articles39.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst