Publication summary
50% 14 analyzed articles/videos 4,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WDIV results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 1,114 hits . Analysis detected 11,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,136 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 27% (277 of 379 publications). This WDIV is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 17,136
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst