Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These www.globalsecurity.org results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 87.8% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 3,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of 100% (2 of 379 publications). This www.globalsecurity.org is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.7% percentile 29.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 87.8% 87.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 50.9% 50.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 51.9% 51.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 43.6% 43.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 56.2% 56.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 35.2% 35.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 28.6% 28.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 33.9% 33.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 17.0% 17.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 18.3% 18.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Optimism Bias: Publication 87.8%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Publication 56.2%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Publication 51.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 50.9%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Publication 43.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Publication 35.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 33.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 28.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 18.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 17.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst