Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Pike results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 87.8% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 3,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of 100% (19 of 6,629 authors). This John Pike is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
John Pike
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%John Pike (selected)30%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
29.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 87.8%87.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 50.9%50.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 51.9%51.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 43.6%43.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 56.2%56.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 35.2%35.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 28.6%28.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 33.9%33.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.0%17.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Author 87.8%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Author 56.2%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Author 51.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 50.9%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 43.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 35.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 33.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 28.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate