Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Radke results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (1 of 6,162 authors). This Bill Radke is worse (more manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bill Radke
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke (selected)60%
Author details
Total words: 78
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

100% percentile
0255075100100.0% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 100.0%100.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 33.3%33.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Author 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Author 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Author 33.3%, sitewide 6.9%Primacy Effect: Author 33.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos