Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MS NOW Live Events results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 84.4% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 270 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (3 of 398 publications). This MS NOW Live Events is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
MS NOW Live Events
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%inlander.com1%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events (selected)26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 270
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
25.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles270 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 84.4%84.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 81.5%81.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 74.4%74.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 37.8%37.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 30.4%30.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Publication 31.9%31.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Publication 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 30.4%30.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 24.4%24.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 28.5%28.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Publication 84.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Publication 81.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Publication 74.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Publication 37.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 35.2%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Publication 31.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 30.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 30.4%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 30.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 28.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 24.4%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Publication 22.2%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Publication 19.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Halo EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos