Wildfire smoke lingers ahead of storm chances to start the week in Southeast Michigan 23%

By Christina Burkhart29%

7/20/2026, 12:27:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 314 faulty-reasoning hits from 204 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (17,016 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the article peer group.

4Warn Weather - A statewide Air Quality Alert will be in effect through Monday as wildfire smoke remains in place. 
With winds out of the south-southwest, levels are expected to improve a bit. 
However, elevated levels of smoke particulates, along with ozone, may present issue for those with respiratory sensitivities. 
It will at least be cooler this week. 
Tonight’s temperatures will fall to near 60°. 
Afternoon highs Monday will reach the low 80s as cloud cover increases. 
You may catch a stray shower in the evening, but most stay dry until the late-night hours. 
Strong thunderstorms will be possible overnight Monday into early Tuesday morning. 
The Storm Prediction Center has placed Southeast Michigan under a Marginal Risk, a level 1 out of 5, for severe weather. 
The main storm hazard will be damaging winds. 
The main time frame looks to be between midnight and 6:00 a.m. 
Tuesday. 
Scattered rain will be possible Tuesday afternoon and evening with highs in the low to mid 80s. 
Wednesday and Thursday will be cooler with high temperatures remaining in the mid 70s. 
We’ll be back around 80 to finish the week with more sunshine. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Christina Burkhart: 1.6%WDIV: 0.7%Anchoring Bias10.3%This article: 8.3%Christina Burkhart: 2.9%WDIV: 3.0%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Christina Burkhart: 0.9%WDIV: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 6.9%Christina Burkhart: 1.0%WDIV: 4.4%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 3.9%Christina Burkhart: 2.2%WDIV: 0.7%Loss Aversion3.9%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 32.8%Christina Burkhart: 9.7%WDIV: 2.0%Optimism Bias32.8%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Christina Burkhart: 9.5%WDIV: 6.0%Negativity Bias13.7%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Christina Burkhart: 1.3%WDIV: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error8.3%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Christina Burkhart: 0.9%WDIV: 1.1%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.3%Christina Burkhart: 6.1%WDIV: 3.9%Appeal to Authority10.3%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 2.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 33.8%Christina Burkhart: 5.2%WDIV: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)33.8%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Christina Burkhart: 0.6%WDIV: 0.1%Middle Ground3.9%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.8%Christina Burkhart: 1.5%WDIV: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice9.8%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 3.3%WDIV: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christina Burkhart: 0.0%WDIV: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

204 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers20%attributed speech163writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage4Warn Weather • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageStorm Prediction Center • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words51% of attributed speech74% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.