Topic summary
⁠91%3 analyzed articles/videos462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forecast results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,109 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,051 of 16,495 topics). This Forecast is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Forecast
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,109
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 14.0%14.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.2%14.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos