Topic summary
⁠1%2 analyzed articles/videos843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pittsburgh Pirates results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 0.6% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,018 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (15,265 of 15,265 topics). This Pittsburgh Pirates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pittsburgh Pirates
Topic details
Total words: 3,018
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos