Topic summary
1%2 analyzed articles/videos6,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Privacy Policy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Self-Serving Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 938 hits. Analysis detected 4,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,211 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 0% (16,555 of 16,559 topics). This Privacy Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Privacy Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 35,211
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.0%0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Cookie Notice7%
The Washington Post92%By Washington Post staff16%9/13/2021, 4:12:27 PM
Terms of Use2%
Brookings1%5/10/2016, 1:57:29 AM