Author summary
0% 21 analyzed articles/videos 11,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Miller results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 8,370 hits . Analysis detected 74,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,690 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (2,984 of 6,135 authors). This Ian Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Ian Miller
Author details
Total words: 50,690
Article count: 21
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score21 analyzed articles50.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst