OutKick97%

San Diego Padres Closer Mason Miller Is An Insane Human Cheat Code Destroying Major League Baseball 12%

By Ian Miller0%

4/17/2026, 11:56:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Recency Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 929 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,052 of 20,369 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the article peer group.

The regional aspect of modern Major League Baseball makes it easy to miss out on stories or players from across the country. 
The San Diego Padres might be one of the best examples of that, considering most of their games start after 9pm Eastern and finish well after midnight. 
So it's forgivable if some baseball fans have not followed Padres closer Mason Miller this season. 
But boy oh boy, should baseball fans be following Mason Miller. 
Because what he's doing to opposing hitters this season, along with his performance for much of last season, is virtually unprecedented and may never be accomplished again. 
RELATED: Here's What The San Diego Padres Record $3.9 Billion Sale Means For Major League Baseball 
Wednesday night, Miller entered in the ninth inning with the Padres up 5-2 on the Seattle Mariners. 
He struck out the side, getting J.P Crawford, Mitch Garver, and Cole Young looking. 
Nothing too unusual about that, right? 
But what is unusual is that Wednesday's dominant performance added to what's become an unimaginable run from Miller. 
To the point where the stats he's putting up would be unrealistic in a video game. 
Mason Miller Dominating Hitters Like We've Never Seen 
Wednesday's outing meant that Miller had officially passed nine innings pitched this season. 
And in those 9.1 innings, he's allowed one hit. 
Not one hit per inning, one total hit. 
He's also allowed one walk, meaning that out of 30 total batters faced, two have reached base. 
His batting average allowed this season is .034. 
He's making professional hitters look worse than when pitchers hit. 
But that's just one side of it. 
The other remarkable side is that of the 30 hitters he's faced, he's struck out 23 of them. 
Nearly 77% of hitters who've come to the plate against him have struck out. 
Last season, the MLB leader in strikeout percentage among qualified pitchers was Tarik Skubal at 32.2%. 
Put differently, Miller's 23 K's in 9.1 innings correlates to just over 22 strikeouts per nine innings. 
For reference, the Major League record for strikeouts in a nine-inning game is 20. 
That's only been achieved four times in baseball history. 
Obviously, Miller is a reliever, not a starter, and it's easier to put up these kinds of numbers in sporadic outings compared to one game where hitters have multiple opportunities to face the same pitcher. 
Still, the scale of what he's doing is mind-boggling. 
And it's not just this season. 
Since June 20, 2025, Miller has allowed two runs. 
Total. 
Over 43.1 regular season innings, he's allowed two runs. 
He's struck out 81 hitters over that same time frame and allowed 10 hits. 149 total batters faced, 10 hits allowed. 
That's a .075 batting average, to go along with an .098 slugging percentage. 
Again, he's making big league hitters look worse than pitchers. 
Here's another way to think about this. 
Baseball-Reference has a statistic called ERA+, where 100 would be effectively league average. 
Last year, Paul Skenes had a 219 ERA+ on his way to winning the NL Cy Young Award. 
In his time in San Diego, Miller's ERA+ is 780. 
Then there's this, per OptaSTATS. 
Miller has struck out, including the playoffs: 
20 of his last 23 hitters 
30 of his last 38 
40 of his last 55 
50 of his last 70 
60 of his last 89 
70 of his last 109 
80 of his last 135 
"No other MLB pitcher in the last 50 years has matched any of those stretches at any point in his career. 
Regular or postseason." 
So how is this possible, you might be wondering. 
Rob Friedman, aka Pitching Ninja on X, put together an overlay video of Miller's 103+mph fastball and slider that explains why hitters have so much trouble. 
They have to sit fastball, because otherwise it's nearly impossible to catch up to 103-104mph. 
But his slider looks nearly identical halfway to the plate, meaning hitters are either way too late for his fastball, or way too early on his slider. 
When he's throwing strikes, as he has been all season, they can't sit back and wait for a 3-0 fastball down the middle either. 
Even when they guess right, the quality of his fastball and slider as individual pitches makes him exceptionally hard to it. 
This bears out when looking at contact rates. 
Thus far in 2026, hitters are making contact just 51.6% of the time when they swing at pitches inside the strike zone. 
In 2025, when hitters swung at pitches in the strike zone from Tarik Skubal, they made contact 77.3% of the time. 
When hitters chase against Miller, the contact rate drops to just 25.8%. 
Last year, Skubal's contact rate allowed on pitches off the plate was 50.1%. 
His stuff is so good that he can throw it for strikes and still get swings and misses. 
When hitters swing at balls, they have little-to-no chance of even making contact, let alone high-quality contact. 
You can't wait him out and hope he walks you, because he's walked one out of 30 hitters this season. 
And his fastball and slider look the same, despite a 15-18mph speed differential. 
What we're seeing is a level of dominance that's almost impossible to comprehend. 
It's only 9.1 innings, so it's possible that these stats regress a bit as the season wears on. 
But at this point, Miller has essentially broken the modern day hitter. 
And made the Padres virtually unbeatable with a lead in the ninth inning. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.2%Ian Miller: 11.4%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.3%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Ian Miller: 3.7%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 3.7%Ian Miller: 0.9%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.1%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Ian Miller: 5.8%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias7.8%This article: 6.5%Ian Miller: 10.7%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.7%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%Ian Miller: 1.7%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.3%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Ian Miller: 14.9%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.5%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 3.7%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.2%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.7%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Ian Miller: 3.3%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.4%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Ian Miller: 2.2%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 2.4%Ian Miller: 0.4%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 3.1%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.9%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%Ian Miller: 2.3%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 13.0%Ian Miller: 3.1%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma13.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.8%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.9%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.9%This article: 10.0%Ian Miller: 13.0%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization10.0%This article: 1.4%Ian Miller: 0.9%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring1.4%This article: 1.2%Ian Miller: 1.0%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 17.5%Ian Miller: 6.3%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion17.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.0%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.0%Ian Miller: 4.2%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.6%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Ian Miller: 0.3%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.9%Ian Miller: 0.3%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division2.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.1%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 2.3%Ian Miller: 0.2%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman2.3%This article: 4.4%Ian Miller: 1.1%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.0%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.4%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.7%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Ian Miller: 1.3%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 2.3%Ian Miller: 1.1%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 19.5%Ian Miller: 16.5%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice19.5%This article: 2.9%Ian Miller: 0.8%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 1.7%Ian Miller: 0.3%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.3%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Ian Miller: 1.6%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

929 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.8%attributed speech903writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRob Friedman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rob Friedman

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.0 ptsWriter: 20.0%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Rob Friedman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.