Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego Padres results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 3,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,819 of 16,562 topics). This San Diego Padres is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
San Diego Padres
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos