OutKick87%

Do the Dodgers get an unfair advantage with 'bizarre' rule impacting Shohei Ohtani? 70%

By Ian Miller0%

4/21/2026, 10:35:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 694 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,209 of 20,368 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the article peer group.

As if they needed more help. 
The Los Angeles Dodgers are Major League Baseball's biggest spending team. 
They've won back-to-back World Series championships. 
They play in one of the sport's largest media markets. 
They have a historic stadium that's undergone extensive renovations to make it a desirable place to come for free agents. 
It's widely believed that they have the game's largest analytics, scouting, and research department to identify minor league and major league talent. 
They were ahead of the curve when it comes to contract deferrals, realizing that players could take their salaries in other states after retirement to save on taxes. 
All while allowing the current organization to pay marginally lower luxury tax bills. 
There's a reputation among players that the Dodgers are the best place to play. 
From their consistency in reaching the postseason, to spending money to build a team, to treating players and their families as good or better than anyone. 
MLB PLAYERS HAVE PICKED A FAVORITE ORGANIZATION, AND FANS WON'T LIKE IT 
If there's an advantage to be found, the Dodgers have found it. 
Oh, and they have Shohei Ohtani. 
Ohtani is a human cheat code. 
One of the top two or three hitters in baseball, who decided to start stealing bases more often while recovering from arm surgery... and then put up the first ever 50-50 season in baseball history. 
That would already make him one of the most valuable players in the sport. 
But he's also a top-15 pitcher who, through three starts, has an ERA of 0.50. 
And he creates another advantage for the Dodgers that opposing managers are not too happy about. 
Shohei Ohtani rule drawing controversy 
Chicago Cubs manager Craig Counsell recently became the latest opposing manager to bring up the so-called Shohei Ohtani rule and how it gives Los Angeles an advantage. 
Because Ohtani is designated as a "two-way" player, he doesn't count against the 13-pitcher roster limits that MLB has placed on teams. 
Essentially, the Dodgers can carry an "extra" pitcher, because Ohtani is treated differently. 
Counsell, whose team was not playing the Dodgers, brought it up when asked about the roster limits. 
"It’s a rule to help offense, I think, more than anything, if you ask me," Counsell said. 
"And then there’s one team that’s allowed to carry basically one of both, and that he gets special consideration. 
Which is probably the most bizarre rule. ... 
For one team." 
"There’s not another player like that, but one team gets different rules for that player," he added. 
Well, here's the thing about that. 
Any team could take advantage of this rule, were there other players who were capable of pitching and hitting. 
The Cubs could decide to get, say, Pete Crow-Armstrong 20 innings on the mound, and he'd be eligible for the two-way player rule, the "Ohtani rule," and give the Cubs the same benefit the Dodgers enjoy. 
But that's obviously not going to happen. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said as much in response: "The thing is, it certainly benefits us, because we have the player," Roberts told the media from Coors Field in Denver. 
"But that’s something that, any team that had Ohtani would have that player." 
"We’re more than willing for other teams to go out and find a player who can do both. 
He’s an exception because he’s an exceptional player. 
It is what it is." 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
And this is where Counsell's criticism falls so flat. 
This is not a rule designed to help the Dodgers. 
In fact, it was created when Ohtani was on the Angels. 
Any other team could find and sign a two-way player. 
They aren't able to because what Ohtani is doing is virtually unprecedented. 
Does it give the Dodgers a benefit? 
Yes. 
Does having Shohei Ohtani give the Dodgers a benefit? 
Yes. 
Could every other team in baseball enjoy the same benefit? 
Also, yes. 
That's why it's not unfair, and why Counsell's complaints come off as sour grapes. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Ian Miller: 11.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic10.2%This article: 4.5%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 1.6%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.6%This article: 8.8%Ian Miller: 5.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias8.8%This article: 5.6%Ian Miller: 10.7%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.5%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Ian Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.9%This article: 3.5%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 10.1%Ian Miller: 14.9%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias10.1%This article: 4.6%Ian Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias4.6%This article: 3.9%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.9%Ian Miller: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect17.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Ian Miller: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 1.7%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem3.3%This article: 5.2%Ian Miller: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man5.2%This article: 9.5%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority9.5%This article: 2.9%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.2%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.2%This article: 1.0%Ian Miller: 13.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization1.0%This article: 0.9%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.9%This article: 5.6%Ian Miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 3.5%Ian Miller: 6.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion3.5%This article: 3.2%Ian Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 5.6%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.6%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.4%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 5.0%Ian Miller: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 1.7%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman1.7%This article: 3.0%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.7%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading2.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 9.5%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection9.5%This article: 6.1%Ian Miller: 16.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice6.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

694 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers20%attributed speech556writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Counsell • 17 words • 100.0% coverageCraig Counsell • 19 words • 100.0% coverageCraig Counsell • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Counsell • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Counsell • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageDave Roberts • 30 words • 100.0% coverageDave Roberts • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Craig Counsell

100%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words46% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+56.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Craig Counsell: 56.3%56.3%Unattributed Quote+26.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Craig Counsell: 26.6%26.6%Biased Writer Voice-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Craig Counsell: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Craig Counsell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.