Keyword summary
90% 23 analyzed articles/videos 4,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Dodgers results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 4,061 hits . Analysis detected 35,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,614 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,326 of 35,635 keywords). This Los Angeles Dodgers is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Los Angeles Dodgers
Keyword details
Total words: 27,614
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score23 analyzed articles27.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst