Publication summary
81% 117 analyzed articles/videos 44,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breitbart results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 25,208 hits . Analysis detected 266,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 212,044 analyzed words across 117 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (141 of 410 publications). This Breitbart is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 212,044
Article count: 117
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score117 analyzed articles212K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst