Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Frances Martel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,535 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,357 authors). This Frances Martel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Frances Martel
Author details
Total words: 2,535
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.1% 31.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.0% 17.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 31.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst