Author summary
79% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Gilbertson results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,319 hits . Analysis detected 13,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,001 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,530 of 6,316 authors). This Nick Gilbertson is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Nick Gilbertson
Author details
Total words: 10,001
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.8% 4.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst