Breitbart83%

Exclusive—Trump: SCOTUS Slaughter Decision ‘More Than Made Up’ for ‘Disappointing’ Birthright Citizenship Ruling 72%

By Nick Gilbertson78% Matthew Boyle69%

7/1/2026, 1:11:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 799 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (5,886 of 20,473 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump told Breitbart News in an exclusive Oval Office interview on Tuesday evening that while he is disappointed about the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding birthright citizenship, the court’s decision in the Trump v. 
Slaughter case, which once again grants a president the power to fire independent agency employees at will, “more than made up” for it. 
Breitbart News’s interview with the president came just hours after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in a 5-4 decision in the Trump v. 
Barbara case. 
The president has long maintained that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, and even attended oral arguments in the case in April at the Supreme Court. 
The Slaughter case came about after the president fired former Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter without cause. 
Slaughter then sued the president, arguing the firing was unconstitutional under the FTC Act, which stated that employees of independent agencies may be removed only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” 
The ruling grants the president the power to fire members of the FTC or other independent agencies without a reason. 
“It was a disappointing decision, but I think it was, from my personal standpoint, more than made up for by the Slaughter decision, because that was one that was going on for almost 100 years where they took power away from FDR and presidents have tried to regain that power for many, many years,” Trump told Breitbart News when asked about the birthright citizenship ruling. 
“If you remember, Taft had the power, and they took it away during FDR, and it’s been almost 100 years, close to 100 years, and everybody’s been trying to regain that power because it was the right thing. 
It was the correct decision. 
But a lot of people didn’t know how that was going to go, and then that one I won at 6 to 3. 
That was a big one. 
That was a very big win,” he added. 
The president noted, as many news outlets have pointed out, that the Slaughter ruling is the most impactful of the term. 
“You see, it was the biggest story, bigger than birthright, and I think probably it’s considered bigger than birthright, and that was a win. 
I’m disappointed about birthright. 
I think it’s ridiculous. 
We’re the only country that does it. 
It’s very expensive, and a lot of bad things can happen,” he said. 
“Now, one of the things that came out during this period of time with the Supreme Court is that we can do it through Congress. 
Some people thought for a while you had to do a Constitutional amendment. 
That’s no longer so,” he continued. 
“So I think we’re going to try to get it through Congress. 
Before we do that, however, it would be nice to get the SAVE America Act passed.” 
When asked about terminating the filibuster to pass a birthright law or the SAVE America Act, which safeguards elections by requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote, voter ID, and ending universal mail-in ballots, Trump emphasized, “You could do everything if you got rid of the filibuster.” 
“You could do SAVE America, you could do every single thing you dreamt of, you could do Kate’s Law, you could do things that people even haven’t thought about,” he said. 
He added that a handful of Republican senators are opposed to lifting the filibuster and predicted that Democrats would immediately nuke it if and when they return to power. 
“We have four or five Republican senators that make life difficult, and it’s a shame. 
You have Lisa Murkowski; you have probably I could say Senator Tillis; Senator Cassidy—maybe for good reason; you have, I would have to say so far Senator Cornyn has been very good, but you have Susan Collins. 
You have to do what’s right. 
I don’t see her voting for it. 
But if you want to have a Republican Party that doesn’t lose an election for 100 years, you terminate the filibuster, and you approve SAVE America, and then you approve another 40 things that you never even thought possible. 
And that we have senators who are opposed to that is absolutely insane, and remember the Democrats will do it in the first hour.” 
Trump escalated his criticisms of Senate Republicans even further on Wednesday, calling on them again to fire the Senate parliamentarian. 
“How the Republican Senate is not firing the Parliamentarian, who was appointed by Radical Left Senator Harry Reid, and Barack Hussein Obama, is beyond me! 
 he wrote in a post on Truth Social. 
‘She has been ruling unfairly against Republicans for years, and Majority Leader John Thune has the right to do it, immediately. 
FIRE THE PARLIAMENTARIAN NOW!’ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%Nick Gilbertson: 2.9%Breitbart: 4.3%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Nick Gilbertson: 4.0%Breitbart: 4.0%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 3.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 8.1%Nick Gilbertson: 1.8%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias8.1%This article: 7.4%Nick Gilbertson: 10.2%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias7.4%This article: 4.1%Nick Gilbertson: 7.2%Breitbart: 11.6%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 8.1%Nick Gilbertson: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect8.1%This article: 11.3%Nick Gilbertson: 5.3%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.3%This article: 1.6%Nick Gilbertson: 1.6%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 17.8%Nick Gilbertson: 5.5%Breitbart: 9.6%Negativity Bias17.8%This article: 13.9%Nick Gilbertson: 6.7%Breitbart: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias13.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 2.5%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%Nick Gilbertson: 6.3%Breitbart: 4.9%In-Group Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.9%Breitbart: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 4.7%Breitbart: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.5%Nick Gilbertson: 2.7%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias10.5%This article: 2.9%Nick Gilbertson: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Nick Gilbertson: 4.4%Breitbart: 3.0%Ad Hominem9.6%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.9%Breitbart: 1.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.6%Nick Gilbertson: 3.9%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority6.6%This article: 10.9%Nick Gilbertson: 3.5%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma10.9%This article: 3.9%Nick Gilbertson: 2.1%Breitbart: 1.4%Slippery Slope3.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 38.0%Nick Gilbertson: 9.2%Breitbart: 8.0%Hasty Generalization38.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.1%Nick Gilbertson: 13.2%Breitbart: 9.0%Appeal to Emotion12.1%This article: 6.0%Nick Gilbertson: 4.8%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question6.0%This article: 2.5%Nick Gilbertson: 4.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 2.2%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Nick Gilbertson: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.1%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy3.1%This article: 5.5%Nick Gilbertson: 3.2%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 4.4%Nick Gilbertson: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 10.8%Nick Gilbertson: 3.0%Breitbart: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 15.5%Nick Gilbertson: 3.5%Breitbart: 2.1%Indoctrination15.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.8%Breitbart: 7.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

799 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker69%attributed speech245writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 65 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 38 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 48 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 39 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

98%flagged-word coverage
554 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+22.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 22.4%22.4%Quote-first Misdirection-14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice+7.9 ptsWriter: 5.3%Donald Trump: 13.2%13.2%Unattributed Quote-5.6 ptsWriter: 9.4%Donald Trump: 3.8%3.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.