Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Statements results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 951 hits. Analysis detected 11,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,140 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,114 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Statements is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Statements
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.1%10.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos