Author summary
68% 4 analyzed articles/videos 6,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Boyle results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 2,505 hits . Analysis detected 30,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,617 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,179 of 6,170 authors). This Matthew Boyle is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Matthew Boyle
Author details
Total words: 25,617
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles25.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst