Publication summary
75% 314 analyzed articles/videos 122,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Newsmax results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 70,399 hits . Analysis detected 641,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 642,402 analyzed words across 311 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (200 of 379 publications). This Newsmax is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 642,402
Article count: 311
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score311 analyzed articles642.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst