Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RONALD BLUM results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,074 hits. Analysis detected 4,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,179 of 6,162 authors). This RONALD BLUM is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
RONALD BLUM
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
33%RONALD BLUM (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,520
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.3%14.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos