Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HuffPost results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 23,748 hits . Analysis detected 236,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 320,598 analyzed words across 110 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (296 of 379 publications). This HuffPost is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. HuffPost
Publication details
Total words: 320,598
Article count: 110
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score110 analyzed articles320.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst