Author summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raphael Satter results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 6,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,056 of 6,537 authors). This Raphael Satter is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Raphael Satter
Author details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.4% 18.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 8.6% 8.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.8% 8.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst