Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AJ Vicens (Reuters) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Burden of Proof , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 3,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of â 96% (291 of 6,348 authors). This AJ Vicens (Reuters) is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. AJ Vicens (Reuters)
Author details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.4% percentile 11.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 29.3% 29.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 23.8% 23.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 16.9% 16.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.0% 19.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 19.9% 19.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 17.7% 17.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anchoring Bias: Author 29.3%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect: Author 28.8%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 20.0%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 19.9%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 17.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 16.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst