Author summary
37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wufei Yu results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 3,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,757 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,510 of 6,353 authors). This Wufei Yu is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Wufei Yu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
29%Wufei Yu (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,757
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos