Author summary
18% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Brown results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,392 hits . Analysis detected 9,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,392 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,016 of 6,227 authors). This Matthew Brown is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Matthew Brown
Author details
Total words: 19,392
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst