Author summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Velasquez results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 1,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,694 of 6,171 authors). This Francisco Velasquez is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Francisco Velasquez
Author details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst