Author summary
4%3 analyzed articles/videos1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlin Reilly results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,281 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,739 of 6,202 authors). This Kaitlin Reilly is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Kaitlin Reilly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
8%Kaitlin Reilly (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,281
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate