Author summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Shapiro results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 361 hits . Analysis detected 2,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,744 of 6,235 authors). This Emily Shapiro is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Emily Shapiro
Author details
Total words: 3,964
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst