Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Sales results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 241 hits . Analysis detected 1,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,966 of 6,202 authors). This Dan Sales is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Dan Sales
Author details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.8% 5.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst