Author summary
45%11 analyzed articles/videos10,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Collin Binkley results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 3,364 hits. Analysis detected 23,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,874 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (4,999 of 6,162 authors). This Collin Binkley is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Collin Binkley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Collin Binkley (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 27,874
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate