Author summary
⁠11%6 analyzed articles/videos10,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luena Rodriguez-Feo Vileira results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,503 hits. Analysis detected 11,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,584 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,113 of 6,185 authors). This Luena Rodriguez-Feo Vileira is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Luena Rodriguez-Feo Vileira
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠2%Luena Rodriguez-Feo Vileira (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 26,584
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
1.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles26.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate