Author summary
37%5 analyzed articles/videos8,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Finley results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,401 hits. Analysis detected 10,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,498 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,758 of 6,234 authors). This Ben Finley is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
Ben Finley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
8%Ben Finley (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,498
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751007.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate