Author summary
0%13 analyzed articles/videos14,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Metz results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,896 hits. Analysis detected 29,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,240 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,695 of 6,135 authors). This Sam Metz is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Sam Metz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
8%Sam Metz (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 46,240
Article count: 13
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles46.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate