Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos5,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Rugaber results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Hindsight Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 2,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,443 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (6,589 of 6,629 authors). This Chris Rugaber is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Chris Rugaber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Chris Rugaber (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,443
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos