Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 5,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edith M. Lederer results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 1,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,808 of 6,202 authors). This Edith M. Lederer is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Edith M. Lederer
Author details
Total words: 5,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst