Author summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos6,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatma Khaled results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,403 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (5,942 of 6,234 authors). This Fatma Khaled is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Fatma Khaled
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠5%Fatma Khaled (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,403
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos