Author summary
⁠0%6 analyzed articles/videos8,478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stan Choe results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,527 hits. Analysis detected 11,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,120 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (5,543 of 6,164 authors). This Stan Choe is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Stan Choe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠11%Stan Choe (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,120
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
025507510010.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos