Author summary
⁠0%6 analyzed articles/videos5,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Lee results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 2,803 hits. Analysis detected 20,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,876 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (4,451 of 6,202 authors). This Matthew Lee is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Matthew Lee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠29%Matthew Lee (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 24,876
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos