Author summary
53%10 analyzed articles/videos2,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Mascaro results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 4,578 hits. Analysis detected 27,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,279 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,890 of 6,171 authors). This Lisa Mascaro is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Lisa Mascaro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Lisa Mascaro (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 33,279
Article count: 10
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate