Publication summary
53% 85 analyzed articles/videos 61,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fortune results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 22,430 hits . Analysis detected 270,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 319,905 analyzed words across 85 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 34% (254 of 379 publications). This Fortune is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 319,905
Article count: 85
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score85 analyzed articles319.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst