Author summary
94% 2 analyzed articles/videos 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eva Roytburg results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 600 hits . Analysis detected 3,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,871 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,557 of 6,171 authors). This Eva Roytburg is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Eva Roytburg
Author details
Total words: 2,871
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.9% 20.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Circular Reasoning: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst